Call Leave a request
Residential premises in the use of several owners – problems and legal methods of its regulation

Residential premises in the use of several owners – problems and legal methods of its regulation

Several owners of premises “under one roof” is a priori a problem for each of them! The scenario is usually classic – banal misunderstandings turn into requests to limit each other’s use of common real estate. The consequences are things under the balcony or behind the gate, changed locks, moral pressure and even fights.

If this is your situation!

Carefully familiarize yourself with the civilized methods of solving the problem! Yes, there are 2 legal options for “peaceful” determination of the order of use of residential premises: establishment of the order of use of common property and separation (allocation) of shares from common property in kind. Application of both is possible both through the court and by personal agreement of the parties.

Out-of-court (contractual) method

It provides for the settlement of a disputed situation by concluding a contract in written form, which clearly establishes the rules of joint ownership and use of a common living space. At the same time, the utility bills are not divided, the contract specifies the obligations of the parties to pay for services to the party to which the account is registered.

At the request of the parties, the contract can be notarized. In this case, the fulfillment of its conditions will be obligatory for the subsequent owners of the object.

This method is quite understandable and does not need to be detailed, but the solution of the problem through the court is worth considering in more detail.

Judicial (lawsuit) method

It provides for the settlement of the dispute in cases where the parties cannot independently determine the order of use of the common living space. Depending on the situation, the court divides and limits the rights of co-owners within the limits of actual ownership and use and resolves the following issues:

  • by providing one side of the premises of the appropriate size with or without compensation;
  • by distributing part of the joint real estate in kind if it is technically possible.

The distribution of a part of the common property in kind is a painstaking way, as it depends on many nuances, and for co-owners it is one of the best. After all, the result will be separate housing for everyone!

Let’s point out the main points of this variant of solving the problem. 

As already mentioned above, it is used only if there is a technical possibility or if there are conditions for its implementation.

Therefore, the goal is to divide housing into separate objects, so that each owner gets his “personal space”.

The procedure of achievement is the technical reconstruction of the object, the result of which should be 2 separate proportional parts of the co-owners of the housing with different addresses assigned to them and, accordingly, bills for the utility.

If it is not “proportionately divided” – the division is carried out with compensation for the person who received a smaller area than the one has. At the same time, consent to this must be obtained from all co-owners.

Nuances of separation – the procedure is carried out in accordance with the current construction regulations with the mandatory examination of the technical possibility of separation with subsequent separation of particles.

Final – “common ownership” ends, as each co-owner becomes a private owner of his allotted share.

Everything seems simple, but…

In practice, any division (division) of the co-owners’ property can be complicated! It may turn out that everything is fine with the property, but not with the land plot on which it is located, the object of division was arbitrarily built (reconstructed, replanned), one of the co-owners is unable to pay compensation, etc.

So, the first thing you should do in order to protect yourself from problems with allocation, you need to seek legal help!

Specialists of the “Grandliga” lawyer association have been working in the legal field of Ukraine since 2011, so they will solve your problem as quickly and effectively as possible – they will tell you what you can apply for and what you can’t, will draw up a contract taking into account all the nuances and implement the protection of your interests” in turnkey trial.

14.09.2023

513

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Supreme Court of Ukraine explained how to recover moral damage from the state

The Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine has shown to citizens that the “inviolable” state, according to the conviction of many, can also be brought to justice! With the conclusion contained in the ruling on case No. 823/782/16 of 15.08.19, the CAC of the Supreme Court “punished” the state body for improper consideration […]

Road accident – compensation for damages and protection of the rights of road users

According to official statistical data, 24,521 road accidents occurred in Ukraine in 2021. This is 67 cases per day. The numbers are terrible. There are many reasons for accidents – weather conditions, malfunction of transport, carelessness of drivers, inattention of pedestrians, etc. It is also terrible that “not breaking” the rules on the road does […]

The expert conclusion about the “probability of forgery” is not an argument

The Supreme Court of Ukraine got the case № 760/10691/18, during which the validity of the sale and purchase agreement was challenged, which, according to the plaintiff, was not signed by him! As a result of the proceedings, a legal opinion was published on 04.09.19! The Ukrainian Supreme Court determined that the expert’s conclusion that […]

Who is a qualified family lawyer and what benefits does he provide to clients?

This is a lawyer whose main specialization is family law. It has a large number of different nuances and aspects that a professional should know best. If you need to challenge the deprivation of rights with the help of a family lawyer or solve any other problem, it makes sense to choose a proven law […]

SCU on the identification of claims

On January 22, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ukraine “closed by sending for reconsideration” case No. 522/5505/19, explaining that claims for recognizing illegal actions of the state registrar with the subsequent cancellation of his decisions to terminate the encumbrance (release of arrest) from the land plot should not be identified with a measure similar in […]

SCU on the validity of the contract after the replacement of the 1st page in it

The impossibility of establishing certain circumstances does not relieve the participants in the process from the need to prove them! This conclusion was made public by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on 25.09.19 following the results of the proceedings in case No. 397/928/16-c. The reason for the dispute was the replacement of the first page […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route