En UaRu
Call Leave a request

Supreme Court of Ukraine on an additional period for accepting an inheritance

According to the rule established by law, the inheritance is accepted within 6 months, counted from the moment of opening the inheritance. The law allows for the possibility of extending this period if the heir, for some good reason, did not have time to enter into inheritance rights.

The disputed points of “validity” of reasons are dealt with by lower courts. Their wrong decisions are “corrected” by the Supreme Court of Ukraine!

Thus, the case No. 756/2764/15-c, “closed” by a legal conclusion regulating aspects of determining an additional period for entering into an inheritance, turned out to be under consideration by the Supreme Court of Ukraine.

Analysis of the situation

Background! In March 2015, a citizen (sister of the deceased, heiress of the 2nd stage) applied to the court with a claim to establish an additional period of 2 months for her to accept the inheritance.

She motivated the claim by her advanced age and the fact that she missed the deadline because of the second heir (the nephew of the deceased), who unlawfully took possession of the documents of the testator, while she was far from the place where the inheritance should be opened.

The notary refused to issue a certificate of inheritance to the plaintiff due to missing the deadline for entering into it.

The court of first instance set an additional term: the old age of the plaintiff, and her lack of legal literacy were recognized as valid reasons! The appeal court upheld this decision!

“The Supreme Court reviewed the case and, following a review, determined that old age and legal illiteracy cannot be considered objective and insurmountable difficulties preventing the timely filing of an application for a desire to enter into inheritance rights.”

The Supreme Court of Ukraine recognized the reasons for the admission as disrespectful, accompanying their decision with the following explanations:

  1. An heir who wants to accept the inheritance, but at the time of the opening of the inheritance did not live permanently with the testator, is obliged to submit a corresponding application to the notary’s office, for this he has 6 months (part 1 of article 1269 and part 1 of article 1270 of the Civil Code) .
  2. Skipping the deadline for accepting an inheritance for good reasons regulates Part 3 of Art. 1272 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, delegating the duty to determine “valid reasons” to the courts.
  3. The courts should determine the “validity of the reasons” through paragraph 24 of the Resolution “On Judicial Practice in Cases of Inheritance” dated May 30, 2008 No. 7, taking into account the fact that these are the reasons associated with objective, insurmountable, significant difficulties for the heir.

Advice to heirs

The analyzed situation quite clearly demonstrates the unpredictability of the pendulum of justice, which can give an inheritance today and take it away tomorrow! The plaintiff needed legal advice from a lawyer to find more weighty arguments in favor of valid reasons.

21.02.2022

391

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
It is possible to change the amount of recoverable legal aid costs

On December 18, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ukraine, by its conclusion in case No. 910/4881/18, published a legal opinion on the collection and determination of the amount of legal aid costs. So, in the course of this trial, the question arose that the amount of UAH 337,665.08 of expenses for legal assistance, spent by […]

SCU on the identification of claims

On January 22, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ukraine “closed by sending for reconsideration” case No. 522/5505/19, explaining that claims for recognizing illegal actions of the state registrar with the subsequent cancellation of his decisions to terminate the encumbrance (release of arrest) from the land plot should not be identified with a measure similar in […]

SCU: matrimonial property is not always divided equally!

The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by its decision in case 308/4390/18 of 16.12.19, determined the aspects of deviation from the principle of equality of shares in the division of jointly acquired property of spouses. The fact of the presence of children living with the father (on his full support) and the mother, who does not […]

Civil marriage: showdown because of the apartment bought in it

Family showdown is an eternal topic! Even the array of family legislation and court practice accumulated over decades does not contain answers to all questions regarding family relations! The Supreme Court once again had to figure out whether or not the testimonies of witnesses certified by a notary are considered legal confirmation of a civil […]

You need to pay for heat, even if it is turned off in the apartment

Is the unauthorized disconnection of the apartment from the heating network a basis for canceling charges for heat? The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by a decision on case No. 522/401/15-c of 25/09/19, answered the question in the negative. The consumer is obliged to pay for the service that has not been consumed anyway! Analyzing – […]

Appealing the decision on the adjustment of the customs value of the goods

The import business has its own challenges, one of the key aspects of which is the clearance of goods at optimal prices. However, often in legal relations with customs authorities, disputes may arise regarding the determination of the customs value of goods or commercial vehicles. In this context, the role of a customs attorney becomes […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route