En UaRu
Call Leave a request

Residential premises in the use of several owners – problems and legal methods of its regulation

Several owners of premises “under one roof” is a priori a problem for each of them! The scenario is usually classic – banal misunderstandings turn into requests to limit each other’s use of common real estate. The consequences are things under the balcony or behind the gate, changed locks, moral pressure and even fights.

If this is your situation!

Carefully familiarize yourself with the civilized methods of solving the problem! Yes, there are 2 legal options for “peaceful” determination of the order of use of residential premises: establishment of the order of use of common property and separation (allocation) of shares from common property in kind. Application of both is possible both through the court and by personal agreement of the parties.

Out-of-court (contractual) method

It provides for the settlement of a disputed situation by concluding a contract in written form, which clearly establishes the rules of joint ownership and use of a common living space. At the same time, the utility bills are not divided, the contract specifies the obligations of the parties to pay for services to the party to which the account is registered.

At the request of the parties, the contract can be notarized. In this case, the fulfillment of its conditions will be obligatory for the subsequent owners of the object.

This method is quite understandable and does not need to be detailed, but the solution of the problem through the court is worth considering in more detail.

Judicial (lawsuit) method

It provides for the settlement of the dispute in cases where the parties cannot independently determine the order of use of the common living space. Depending on the situation, the court divides and limits the rights of co-owners within the limits of actual ownership and use and resolves the following issues:

  • by providing one side of the premises of the appropriate size with or without compensation;
  • by distributing part of the joint real estate in kind if it is technically possible.

The distribution of a part of the common property in kind is a painstaking way, as it depends on many nuances, and for co-owners it is one of the best. After all, the result will be separate housing for everyone!

Let’s point out the main points of this variant of solving the problem. 

As already mentioned above, it is used only if there is a technical possibility or if there are conditions for its implementation.

Therefore, the goal is to divide housing into separate objects, so that each owner gets his “personal space”.

The procedure of achievement is the technical reconstruction of the object, the result of which should be 2 separate proportional parts of the co-owners of the housing with different addresses assigned to them and, accordingly, bills for the utility.

If it is not “proportionately divided” – the division is carried out with compensation for the person who received a smaller area than the one has. At the same time, consent to this must be obtained from all co-owners.

Nuances of separation – the procedure is carried out in accordance with the current construction regulations with the mandatory examination of the technical possibility of separation with subsequent separation of particles.

Final – “common ownership” ends, as each co-owner becomes a private owner of his allotted share.

Everything seems simple, but…

In practice, any division (division) of the co-owners’ property can be complicated! It may turn out that everything is fine with the property, but not with the land plot on which it is located, the object of division was arbitrarily built (reconstructed, replanned), one of the co-owners is unable to pay compensation, etc.

So, the first thing you should do in order to protect yourself from problems with allocation, you need to seek legal help!

Specialists of the “Grandliga” lawyer association have been working in the legal field of Ukraine since 2011, so they will solve your problem as quickly and effectively as possible – they will tell you what you can apply for and what you can’t, will draw up a contract taking into account all the nuances and implement the protection of your interests” in turnkey trial.

14.09.2023

260

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
It is possible to change the amount of recoverable legal aid costs

On December 18, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ukraine, by its conclusion in case No. 910/4881/18, published a legal opinion on the collection and determination of the amount of legal aid costs. So, in the course of this trial, the question arose that the amount of UAH 337,665.08 of expenses for legal assistance, spent by […]

Challenging fraudulent agreements as a debt collection tool

Everyone who is engaged in business has at least once encountered a situation when an unscrupulous debtor begins to alienate his property in order to avoid paying the debt. This can happen in advance – even before the debt as such arises (property alienation occurs for no apparent reason and in the absence of obvious […]

CEC-Supreme Court of Ukraine: what should the economic court find out before rejecting the claim?

The Joint Chamber of the CEC of the Supreme Court of Ukraine spoke out on the motivation for refusals to consider claims. In the ruling in case No. 910/6642/18 of 06/14/19, the courts were explained what exactly they should find out before deciding to dismiss the claim when considering economic disputes in the context of […]

Ban on travel abroad: aspects of imposition and removal!

CPCU prohibits debtors from leaving the country! This means that when trying to go abroad, an individual may suddenly find out that it is he who is prohibited from doing this, since this restrictive measure has been applied to him, established as an enforcement of the court decision. “Surprise”! Debt payment does not automatically open […]

SPU on the fulfillment of obligations in a fictitious transaction

Fictitious transactions with residential real estate are always a risk of being left without a roof over your head. It is not entirely clear what the citizen thought, who fictitiously sold his apartment to other people, whose purpose was to obtain a loan from a bank secured by this property. As a result, he had […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine on the disclosure of classified materials in criminal cases

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine considered the criminal case No. 751/7557/15-k and on January 16, 2019 published a resolution that regulated the application the Art. 290th Criminal Code. It is important that the Supreme Court decided not to deviate from the existing legal conclusion regulating the procedural aspects of opening materials […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route