Call Leave a request
Dismissal of the director without the consent of the founders (participants)

Dismissal of the director without the consent of the founders (participants)

In Ukraine, there are many legal entities that do not conduct economic activity and, accordingly, do not charge a salary to the director, who remains the only employee. The procedure for liquidation of such enterprises is quite complicated, so the owners are in no hurry to close them. Often, the owners simply lose interest in business, go abroad, or ignore issues related to the activities of such companies.

The directors of such companies actually “hang” in the USR, nobody can solve the issue of their dismissal. There are also situations when conflicts arise between company members, due to which it is impossible to gather the necessary number of votes to dismiss the director, or the members simply ignore his statements.

The director of the enterprise (business partnership) actually has a dual status: on the one hand, he is an employee subject to the labor legislation, and on the other hand, he is a sole executive body of the enterprise or part of its collegial executive body.

However, a company cannot exist without a manager, and even more so – without an executive body, so the dismissal of a director can actually take place by terminating his powers as an executive body, i.e. simultaneously with the appointment of a new manager (or a person who will perform his functions before the appointment of such a manager ).

At the same time, the powers of the director can be terminated only by the Higher Management Body or a single participant.

Current legislation prohibits forced labor and provides for the possibility of dismissal of a person at his own will. On the other hand, corporate law requires a decision of the company’s highest management body to terminate the powers of the executive body.

What to do in case of inactivity of the higher management body?

Again, the Constitution of Ukraine comes to the rescue: the second part of Article 8 guarantees the right to go to court to protect the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens.

Ukrainian courts have developed a positive practice for managers who find themselves in a similar situation.

Algorithm of actions for terminating the authority of the manager without the consent of the participants:

1. Write a resignation letter and send it to the company’s legal address or arrange for field delivery if appropriate. A copy of the specified application should also be sent to the registration addresses of the company’s members.

2. Draw up a demand for convening a meeting of the higher management body at the initiative of the executive body regarding the director’s dismissal and send it to the company’s participants’ registration addresses.

3. Appear at the meeting and record the fact that the meeting did not take place by drawing up a protocol in case of insufficient quorum to make a decision on the termination of the powers of the director or an act on the non-appearance of participants. In case of non-appearance of the participants, it is advisable to attract witnesses to record this event.

4. Prepare a statement of claim and submit it to the court. At this stage, you should correctly choose the method of protection of violated rights and determine the claims accordingly. It is important that the lawsuit contains requirements of a mandatory nature, because after receiving a positive court decision, it will have to be fulfilled.

We recommend using the following requirements:

  1. terminate the powers of the director;
  2. exclude information about the plaintiff as a manager from the register of legal entities;
  3. determine the appropriate participant by the head of the company (as an option, the one with the largest percentage of votes in the company). Because in the process of fulfilling the second requirement, the registrar cannot leave the section of information about the head of the company unfilled.

5. Obtain a positive court decision and submit it to the state registrar for appropriate registration actions.

Of course, the implementation of this algorithm, at first glance, may seem like a simple and ordinary process, but in practice, at each of the specified stages, various legal nuances arise, the solution of which requires professional legal support. Therefore, it will be advisable to contact a professional lawyer who will help to carry out the dismissal of the director and avoid misunderstandings and mistakes during the mentioned procedure and direct defense in court.

04.04.2024

638

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Aspects of calculating court fees when collecting a mortgage

“On claims for foreclosure on the subject of a mortgage, the court fee is calculated based on the value of the pledged property, and not on the amount of the debt obligation!” – expressed the Supreme Court of Ukraine by the decision on the case No. 307/23/18 dated 02.10.19. The conclusion was made after considering […]

Why is competent defense important in criminal prosecution?

If a person has had to face criminal prosecution for some reason, then it is very important to enlist the support of a truly experienced and competent lawyer. A qualified criminal defense has many benefits that can significantly affect the outcome of a trial and protect the rights and interests of the accused. A competent […]

Ukrainian Supreme Court on the loss of the right to use housing due to non-residence

By its decision in case No. 465/7083/13-c of 10.07.19, the Supreme Court of Ukraine provided a kind of housing legal advice, answering the question whether the fact that minors did not living in an apartment in itself was an unconditional justification for their loss of the right to use the living space. The question arose […]

Successful litigation strategy of protection in case of drink driving

Professional legal aid often ensures successful appeals against the decision of the first instance court. See for yourself how events can develop with one fresh example. The pensioner, a disabled person of the III group, was threatened with a fine in the amount of UAH 10 200.00 and deprivation of a driver’s license for a […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine explained how to recover moral damage from the state

The Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine has shown to citizens that the “inviolable” state, according to the conviction of many, can also be brought to justice! With the conclusion contained in the ruling on case No. 823/782/16 of 15.08.19, the CAC of the Supreme Court “punished” the state body for improper consideration […]

Supreme Court: debt collection and replacement of debtors in enforcement proceedings

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine has figured out the issue of who is legally obliged to pay off debts when replacing the original debtor with two – the main and subsidiary at the stage of execution of the court decision. “The replacement of the parties does not relieve anyone from responsibility, […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route