En UaRu
Call Leave a request

Aspects of calculating court fees when collecting a mortgage

“On claims for foreclosure on the subject of a mortgage, the court fee is calculated based on the value of the pledged property, and not on the amount of the debt obligation!” – expressed the Supreme Court of Ukraine by the decision on the case No. 307/23/18 dated 02.10.19.

The conclusion was made after considering the cassation appeal of the creditor-recoverer against the decisions of the courts of first and appellate instances, by which they refused the plaintiff to consider the claims.

Background of the analyzed dispute:

  1. The legal entity went to court with a claim against three persons. He asked to recognize him as a proper mortgage holder, and two persons as proper mortgagers and to foreclose on the subject of a mortgage in order to pay off the debt on the loan.
  2. The first instance left the claim without moving, notifying the applicant of the need to provide the court with information on the adoption of measures for pre-trial settlement of the dispute, if any.
  3. The court also asked to provide an approximate estimate of court costs and a receipt for payment of the court fee.
  4. The applicant did not respond to the court’s request, the application was returned with the comment “the shortcomings have not been eliminated, the court fee has not been paid”. The appeal claim also remained without progress.

The case came to the consideration of the Supreme Court of Ukraine

“The plaintiff pointed to the groundlessness of the refusal of the courts of the previous instances. Motivated by the following: declared two claims of a non-property nature and one property, namely, an appeal for the collection of a mortgage by recognizing ownership. According to Clause 2, Part 1, Article 176 of the Civil Code, in such claims, their price is determined by the value of the mortgage property, and plaintiff paid the court fee.”

Ukrainian Supreme Court analyzed the circumstances of the dispute

An error significant for judicial representation was found in the calculations of the court of first instance! The court erroneously proceeded from the amount of debt under the loan agreement, for the purpose of repayment of which the plaintiff applied to the court with a demand to foreclose on the subject of the mortgage by recognizing his ownership of the pledge.

Consequently, the case should have been heard because:

  1. The legal basis (payers, objects and rates) for the collection of court fees is determined by the Law of Ukraine “On court fees” and for a property claim of a legal entity it is 1.5% of the cost of the claim.
  2. The price of the claim is determined in this case under Art. 176 GPKU based on the value of the property, since the claim concerns the recognition of ownership.
  3. The content of the declared claim is based on the existence of monetary claims on the basis of a separate agreement, the consequence of the satisfaction of which will be their termination.
  4. In this case, the claims for the collection of the pledged property have a value estimate, are of a property nature and the rate for their filing is calculated in accordance with Art. 4th Law of Ukraine “On court fees”.

30.12.2019

381

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
The case was considered by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

The Supreme Court of Ukraine did not allow the bank to prohibit its debtors from leaving Ukraine, since the CPCU does not have such a measure to secure claims as a temporary restriction of the right to travel abroad, even if a foreclosure procedure has been started with respect to mortgage property. Brief overview of […]

Ways to circumvent legal obstacles in debt collection and rights of debtors

In this article, we will explore how to bypass legal obstacles in debt collection and clarify the rights of debtors. One of the effective ways to overcome legal obstacles is to establish a voluntary agreement between the creditor and the debtor. An approach could involve agreeing on a debt repayment plan that takes into account […]

What to do if a court decision comes to collect a loan debt?

Many had to take out loans, and for a wide variety of purposes. It is not always possible to repay the debt fully and on time, which can potentially lead to a wide variety of difficulties. Sometimes the creditor tries to collect money through the courts. In such a situation, you need to understand your […]

Legal defense in court: main methods, features

If a particular case comes to trial, it is very important to enlist the support of an experienced lawyer who has the knowledge, skills and all other resources. He will be able to accurately select the most effective method of defense in court in each specific situation. The likelihood of achieving a successful result depends […]

Challenging fraudulent agreements as a debt collection tool

Everyone who is engaged in business has at least once encountered a situation when an unscrupulous debtor begins to alienate his property in order to avoid paying the debt. This can happen in advance – even before the debt as such arises (property alienation occurs for no apparent reason and in the absence of obvious […]

SCU. Jurisdiction of corporate disputes between JSC participants

The Ukrainian Supreme Court answered the question, in which courts are considered disputes arising from corporate relations between current and retired members of companies, regarding invalidation of decisions of general meetings, amendments to statutes, as well as in which courts the termination of contracts for the sale and purchase of parts in authorized capital and […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route