Call Leave a request
SCU. Jurisdiction of corporate disputes between JSC participants

SCU. Jurisdiction of corporate disputes between JSC participants

The Ukrainian Supreme Court answered the question, in which courts are considered disputes arising from corporate relations between current and retired members of companies, regarding invalidation of decisions of general meetings, amendments to statutes, as well as in which courts the termination of contracts for the sale and purchase of parts in authorized capital and valuable papers.

Thus, the Supreme Court of Ukraine (the judicial chamber of the CCC) considered the case on claims combined into one proceeding, during which the securities sale and purchase agreements were declared invalid.

The plaintiffs were represented by one of the shareholders. The buyer of the shares was a company acting on the basis of an order under a stock market brokerage agreement.

The regional court and the appeal court refused to satisfy the claim to invalidate the securities purchase and sale agreements!

Motivated by the fact that the disputed securities purchase and sale agreements were concluded on the basis of notarized powers of attorney issued personally by the plaintiffs and valid at the time of the contested transactions. The latter are concluded in accordance with the conditions prescribed in the powers of attorney.

“The civil court of cassation did not agree with such conclusions of the courts of previous instances! Court analyzed the arguments of the parties and concluded that such disputes are economic and legal, respectively, are considered in the order of economic proceedings”!

Key points of the decision in case No. 760/23870/17-c from 05.01. 2020 (case No. 61-1155cv19) of this body of justice:

  1. Clause 4 of Part 1 of Art. 12 in the current edition of the EPCU at the time of filing the claim indicated that economic courts are subject to cases “generated” by corporate legal relations in disputes between a legal entity and its current or retired participants (founders, members, shareholders), as well as between participants related to the creation , activities, management and termination of the legal entity, the rights and obligations of the participants in the legal entity, with the exception of labor disputes.
  2. The dispute being analyzed arose regarding the disposal of shares, therefore, it is corporate and should be considered in the course of economic proceedings. In this case, the decisions of the courts of the previous instances are subject to cancellation, and the proceedings on the case are closed on the basis of “non-jurisdictional”.

Legal entities that do not use complex legal support of business in their business should know all the legal conclusions governing this area in order to know which authority they should contact to resolve disputes.

The list of conclusions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the topic: No. 359/10663/18 (case No. 14-537ts19) dated 11.12.2019, No. 756/10182/16-c (case No. 12-226cc18) dated 13.02.2019, No. 331/2533/17 (case No. 14-315cc18) dated 03.10.2018 and No. 911/1437/17 dated 18.12.2018.

10.05.2020

440

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Appealing a bank decision based on financial monitoring results

In recent years, the tightening of financial monitoring requirements has led to an increase in the number of cases where banks stop spending operations on an account or refuse to serve customers, citing “establishing an unacceptably high risk and terminating business relations.” For many customers, especially legal entities and individual entrepreneurs, such decisions have serious […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine on an additional period for accepting an inheritance

According to the rule established by law, the inheritance is accepted within 6 months, counted from the moment of opening the inheritance. The law allows for the possibility of extending this period if the heir, for some good reason, did not have time to enter into inheritance rights. The disputed points of “validity” of reasons […]

Successful litigation strategy of protection in case of drink driving

Professional legal aid often ensures successful appeals against the decision of the first instance court. See for yourself how events can develop with one fresh example. The pensioner, a disabled person of the III group, was threatened with a fine in the amount of UAH 10 200.00 and deprivation of a driver’s license for a […]

The new owner is not entitled to evict the debtor from mortgage housing

The Supreme Court of Ukraine considered the case on the eviction of the former owner (debtor of the bank) from the apartment purchased (by the new owner). A relevant legal conclusion has been published, informative for real estate buyers and bank borrowers. Thus, a new non-owner who has bought “risky” real estate from a mortgagee […]

Ukrainian Supreme Court determined the conditions for declaring downtime for employers

The Supreme Court has once again rescued ordinary citizens-workers from a thrifty employer who was trying to optimize costs with the help of downtime by not paying workers wages! The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by a resolution in case No. 210/5853/16-c, adopted on January 30, 2019, indicated to this employer and his other thoughtful colleagues […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine stopped family showdown over a shopping pavilion

By decision in case No. 202/3788 / 18 of 04.08.2020, the Supreme Court of Ukraine stopped the family showdown regarding the shopping pavilion, which the spouses had been sharing for several years. The court determined that the trade tent is movable property, transactions in respect of which are not subject to state registration, but it […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route