Call Leave a request
Ukrainian Supreme Court determined the conditions for declaring downtime for employers

Ukrainian Supreme Court determined the conditions for declaring downtime for employers

The Supreme Court has once again rescued ordinary citizens-workers from a thrifty employer who was trying to optimize costs with the help of downtime by not paying workers wages!

The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by a resolution in case No. 210/5853/16-c, adopted on January 30, 2019, indicated to this employer and his other thoughtful colleagues that idle time at an enterprise means a complete cessation of his work.

If there is no complete stop, then there is no downtime. Consequently, there are no consequences, in particular, non-payment of wages to employees.

The problem was “born” from a class action lawsuit filed by employees of a legal entity-employer for the time of forced absenteeism due to illegal idle time.

In fact, to each of them was declared downtime in work, which became the reason for a salary of 2/3 of the salary. The claimants justified the claim by the fact that the simple unlawful, therefore, they must be paid a full salary for the period of downtime to everyone.

The court of first instance dismissed the claim!

Court motivated his decision by the fact that the employer had taken measures to maintain employment and the plaintiffs were repeatedly offered other work at the enterprise, which they refused.

“Simply put, the local court told the plaintiffs:“ Be glad that you were not fired, and don’t demand an additional payment, since the current article 113 of the Labor Code of Ukraine and the provisions of the collective agreement in force at the enterprise do not contradict the employer’s actions! ”

The appeal court did not support the decision of the local court!

The employer was told about a violation of the downtime announcement procedure. The conditions for announcing this event are spelled out in Art. 34 Labor Code.

Downtime is considered by law to be the suspension of work due to inevitable force (other circumstances) that gave rise to the lack of organizational or technical conditions necessary for the continuation of the enterprise.

The Ukrainian Supreme Court agreed with the decision of the appellate instance!

The fact that the enterprise have operated, while the plaintiffs’ work functions during their absence were carried out by employees of another enterprise, was once again investigated.

Based on this fact, the Supreme Court of Ukraine decided to satisfy the claims of the plaintiffs, since there is no downtime at the enterprise – there is no right not to pay the employer’s salary!

P.S. We will be glad if legal advice on the pages of our site will help you to understand the problems with employers. Also contact the human rights defenders of the legal service personally, if necessary!

26.04.2020

602

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Ukrainian Supreme Court on “legalizing real estate with obstacles”

The Ukrainian Supreme Court helped the investor! With the conclusion in case No. 761/5598/15-c of 04.24.2019, he recognized his legal rights in court! History in detail In 2003, an individual investor and a legal entity-developer entered into an agreement on equity participation in the financing of construction. The parties undertook to work together to achieve […]

One aspect of resolving disputes over land use rights

Disputed land under the construction is a potential litigation with all the ensuing consequences. The Supreme Court of Ukraine considered one of such disputes and published a legal opinion, which determines that the granting of permission for the development of a land management project regarding the allotment of a “non-free” land plot does not give […]

Who is a qualified family lawyer and what benefits does he provide to clients?

This is a lawyer whose main specialization is family law. It has a large number of different nuances and aspects that a professional should know best. If you need to challenge the deprivation of rights with the help of a family lawyer or solve any other problem, it makes sense to choose a proven law […]

BC-Supreme Court of Ukraine “forbade” Privat to collect % and fines on credit cards

By its decision in case No. 342/180/17 of 03/07/19, the BC-Supreme Court of Ukraine “broke” the established judicial practice on the collection of overdue debt on PrivatBank credit cards! From this date, the terms and conditions for the provision of banking services posted on the pages of the PrivatBank website: Are not considered a public […]

Is it legal to sublet land bypassing the lessor?

Is the transfer of leased land to sublease without the consent of the owner legal? If so, in what cases? If not, when? What does the law tell us about this and how are litigations resolved between the parties to such legal relations, which, due to ignorance of regulatory rules, violate the law? Thus, lease-contractual […]

Remote participation of persons in court sessions

The participation of the accused (convicted) person in the trial by video link, can it be considered by law as direct personal? The answer to the question contains the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and this material. We analyze One of the innovations introduced in 2012 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is the […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route