En UaRu
Call Leave a request

SCU. Jurisdiction of corporate disputes between JSC participants

The Ukrainian Supreme Court answered the question, in which courts are considered disputes arising from corporate relations between current and retired members of companies, regarding invalidation of decisions of general meetings, amendments to statutes, as well as in which courts the termination of contracts for the sale and purchase of parts in authorized capital and valuable papers.

Thus, the Supreme Court of Ukraine (the judicial chamber of the CCC) considered the case on claims combined into one proceeding, during which the securities sale and purchase agreements were declared invalid.

The plaintiffs were represented by one of the shareholders. The buyer of the shares was a company acting on the basis of an order under a stock market brokerage agreement.

The regional court and the appeal court refused to satisfy the claim to invalidate the securities purchase and sale agreements!

Motivated by the fact that the disputed securities purchase and sale agreements were concluded on the basis of notarized powers of attorney issued personally by the plaintiffs and valid at the time of the contested transactions. The latter are concluded in accordance with the conditions prescribed in the powers of attorney.

“The civil court of cassation did not agree with such conclusions of the courts of previous instances! Court analyzed the arguments of the parties and concluded that such disputes are economic and legal, respectively, are considered in the order of economic proceedings”!

Key points of the decision in case No. 760/23870/17-c from 05.01. 2020 (case No. 61-1155cv19) of this body of justice:

  1. Clause 4 of Part 1 of Art. 12 in the current edition of the EPCU at the time of filing the claim indicated that economic courts are subject to cases “generated” by corporate legal relations in disputes between a legal entity and its current or retired participants (founders, members, shareholders), as well as between participants related to the creation , activities, management and termination of the legal entity, the rights and obligations of the participants in the legal entity, with the exception of labor disputes.
  2. The dispute being analyzed arose regarding the disposal of shares, therefore, it is corporate and should be considered in the course of economic proceedings. In this case, the decisions of the courts of the previous instances are subject to cancellation, and the proceedings on the case are closed on the basis of “non-jurisdictional”.

Legal entities that do not use complex legal support of business in their business should know all the legal conclusions governing this area in order to know which authority they should contact to resolve disputes.

The list of conclusions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the topic: No. 359/10663/18 (case No. 14-537ts19) dated 11.12.2019, No. 756/10182/16-c (case No. 12-226cc18) dated 13.02.2019, No. 331/2533/17 (case No. 14-315cc18) dated 03.10.2018 and No. 911/1437/17 dated 18.12.2018.

10.05.2020

358

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Ukrainian Supreme Court on the loss of the right to use housing due to non-residence

By its decision in case No. 465/7083/13-c of 10.07.19, the Supreme Court of Ukraine provided a kind of housing legal advice, answering the question whether the fact that minors did not living in an apartment in itself was an unconditional justification for their loss of the right to use the living space. The question arose […]

The Supreme Court to the Prosecutor’s Office is a friend and comrade! Don’t believe? Read on!

The case № 638/8636/17-c considered by the Supreme Court, 05/13/2020, was closed by a legal conclusion, according to which the inactivity of the prosecutor’s office is not evidence of moral harm, therefore, it cannot be compensated! Initially, the lawsuit was initiated by a citizen who believes that the inaction of the law enforcement system is […]

Ban on travel abroad: aspects of imposition and removal!

CPCU prohibits debtors from leaving the country! This means that when trying to go abroad, an individual may suddenly find out that it is he who is prohibited from doing this, since this restrictive measure has been applied to him, established as an enforcement of the court decision. “Surprise”! Debt payment does not automatically open […]

Appealing the decision on the adjustment of the customs value of the goods

The import business has its own challenges, one of the key aspects of which is the clearance of goods at optimal prices. However, often in legal relations with customs authorities, disputes may arise regarding the determination of the customs value of goods or commercial vehicles. In this context, the role of a customs attorney becomes […]

SCU on the identification of claims

On January 22, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ukraine “closed by sending for reconsideration” case No. 522/5505/19, explaining that claims for recognizing illegal actions of the state registrar with the subsequent cancellation of his decisions to terminate the encumbrance (release of arrest) from the land plot should not be identified with a measure similar in […]

GDPR compliance in 2024: what companies should pay attention to

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is one of the strictest privacy laws in the world. It applies to all companies that process personal data of residents of the European Union, regardless of where the company itself is located. Failure to comply with the provisions of the GDPR can result in significant fines and reputational […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route