En UaRu
Call Leave a request

SCU. Jurisdiction of corporate disputes between JSC participants

The Ukrainian Supreme Court answered the question, in which courts are considered disputes arising from corporate relations between current and retired members of companies, regarding invalidation of decisions of general meetings, amendments to statutes, as well as in which courts the termination of contracts for the sale and purchase of parts in authorized capital and valuable papers.

Thus, the Supreme Court of Ukraine (the judicial chamber of the CCC) considered the case on claims combined into one proceeding, during which the securities sale and purchase agreements were declared invalid.

The plaintiffs were represented by one of the shareholders. The buyer of the shares was a company acting on the basis of an order under a stock market brokerage agreement.

The regional court and the appeal court refused to satisfy the claim to invalidate the securities purchase and sale agreements!

Motivated by the fact that the disputed securities purchase and sale agreements were concluded on the basis of notarized powers of attorney issued personally by the plaintiffs and valid at the time of the contested transactions. The latter are concluded in accordance with the conditions prescribed in the powers of attorney.

“The civil court of cassation did not agree with such conclusions of the courts of previous instances! Court analyzed the arguments of the parties and concluded that such disputes are economic and legal, respectively, are considered in the order of economic proceedings”!

Key points of the decision in case No. 760/23870/17-c from 05.01. 2020 (case No. 61-1155cv19) of this body of justice:

  1. Clause 4 of Part 1 of Art. 12 in the current edition of the EPCU at the time of filing the claim indicated that economic courts are subject to cases “generated” by corporate legal relations in disputes between a legal entity and its current or retired participants (founders, members, shareholders), as well as between participants related to the creation , activities, management and termination of the legal entity, the rights and obligations of the participants in the legal entity, with the exception of labor disputes.
  2. The dispute being analyzed arose regarding the disposal of shares, therefore, it is corporate and should be considered in the course of economic proceedings. In this case, the decisions of the courts of the previous instances are subject to cancellation, and the proceedings on the case are closed on the basis of “non-jurisdictional”.

Legal entities that do not use complex legal support of business in their business should know all the legal conclusions governing this area in order to know which authority they should contact to resolve disputes.

The list of conclusions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the topic: No. 359/10663/18 (case No. 14-537ts19) dated 11.12.2019, No. 756/10182/16-c (case No. 12-226cc18) dated 13.02.2019, No. 331/2533/17 (case No. 14-315cc18) dated 03.10.2018 and No. 911/1437/17 dated 18.12.2018.

10.05.2020

206

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Supreme Court of Ukraine on the interpretation of treaties on the basis of contra proferentem

The Ukrainian Supreme Court “remembered” about the “contra proferentem” principle! By the decision in case No. 756/1381/17-c of 03/25/2020, he consolidated the legal conclusion based on this doctrine. It reads: “If the interpretation of the content of a written agreement by means of general methods is impossible, the contra proferentem interpretation is used – the […]

The role of an attorney during interrogation: more than just presence

Being called in for questioning by law enforcement is always a stressful situation, even if the person is not a suspect. In such cases, it would be a good idea to seek legal assistance from a lawyer specializing in criminal law. At first glance, the role of a criminal lawyer during interrogation may seem minimal: […]

When is it impossible to evict from mortgage housing “to nowhere”?

The most useful legal opinion of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in case No. 761/22755/18 of 06.11.2019 – legal assistance (consultation), a life story about how the bank failed to evict a defaulting borrower from a mortgage apartment “to nowhere”! Background of the proceedings The bank applied to the court with a claim for eviction […]

Had delayed paying severance pay? Pay the fine!

The first thing every citizen leaving his old place of work thinks about is how much money will fall on the card as a severance pay. Naturally, he wants more and that’s okay! The employer who signs the dismissal order is thinking about how to pay less! And he can be understood too! But, the […]

“Lustrated” civil servants contested dismissal in the ECHR

Any protection of interests in court is a procedure limited by the terms prescribed by law! How long any dispute can be considered in court depends on the specific circumstances of each individual situation. Ukrainian legislation “allows” litigation to last for years, and the European Court from time to time tries to suppress this pattern, […]

Residential premises in the use of several owners – problems and legal methods of its regulation

Several owners of premises “under one roof” is a priori a problem for each of them! The scenario is usually classic – banal misunderstandings turn into requests to limit each other’s use of common real estate. The consequences are things under the balcony or behind the gate, changed locks, moral pressure and even fights. If […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route