En UaRu
Call Leave a request

Ukrainian Supreme Court determined the conditions for declaring downtime for employers

The Supreme Court has once again rescued ordinary citizens-workers from a thrifty employer who was trying to optimize costs with the help of downtime by not paying workers wages!

The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by a resolution in case No. 210/5853/16-c, adopted on January 30, 2019, indicated to this employer and his other thoughtful colleagues that idle time at an enterprise means a complete cessation of his work.

If there is no complete stop, then there is no downtime. Consequently, there are no consequences, in particular, non-payment of wages to employees.

The problem was “born” from a class action lawsuit filed by employees of a legal entity-employer for the time of forced absenteeism due to illegal idle time.

In fact, to each of them was declared downtime in work, which became the reason for a salary of 2/3 of the salary. The claimants justified the claim by the fact that the simple unlawful, therefore, they must be paid a full salary for the period of downtime to everyone.

The court of first instance dismissed the claim!

Court motivated his decision by the fact that the employer had taken measures to maintain employment and the plaintiffs were repeatedly offered other work at the enterprise, which they refused.

“Simply put, the local court told the plaintiffs:“ Be glad that you were not fired, and don’t demand an additional payment, since the current article 113 of the Labor Code of Ukraine and the provisions of the collective agreement in force at the enterprise do not contradict the employer’s actions! ”

The appeal court did not support the decision of the local court!

The employer was told about a violation of the downtime announcement procedure. The conditions for announcing this event are spelled out in Art. 34 Labor Code.

Downtime is considered by law to be the suspension of work due to inevitable force (other circumstances) that gave rise to the lack of organizational or technical conditions necessary for the continuation of the enterprise.

The Ukrainian Supreme Court agreed with the decision of the appellate instance!

The fact that the enterprise have operated, while the plaintiffs’ work functions during their absence were carried out by employees of another enterprise, was once again investigated.

Based on this fact, the Supreme Court of Ukraine decided to satisfy the claims of the plaintiffs, since there is no downtime at the enterprise – there is no right not to pay the employer’s salary!

P.S. We will be glad if legal advice on the pages of our site will help you to understand the problems with employers. Also contact the human rights defenders of the legal service personally, if necessary!

26.04.2020

320

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Secrets of a Successful Legal Consultation: How to Get the Most Out of Your Meeting with an Attorney

Meeting with an attorney is a crucial step in resolving legal issues and successfully protecting a client’s interests. An attorney is a professional who can provide qualified legal assistance and support. But how can you maximize the benefits of your meeting with them and ensure a successful outcome? 1. Studying the Attorney’s Successful Cases First […]

Ukrainian courts are cutting lawyer fees to the maximum

Every self-respecting judge considers it his duty to reduce the lawyer’s fee as much as possible. This “phenomenon” is especially painful for lawyers working on an hourly basis. Why is that? God only knows! God knows, but for human rights defenders – absolutely incomprehensible, because the law and practice of the Armed Forces of Ukraine […]

Representation of interests in the ICAC at the CCI of Ukraine

The International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Ukraine is one of the key institutions for resolving disputes in the field of international business. In this article, we will consider in which cases it is appropriate to apply to the ICAC, who has the right to such an application, […]

Can spouses divide an unauthorized built house in case of divorce?

They wanted to save money, but it turned out the other way around. The couple built a house in which they planned to live happily ever after, but the family union fell apart … In court, the question arose of how to divide the house, which, as it turned out, cannot be divided due to […]

BC-Supreme Court of Ukraine “forbade” Privat to collect % and fines on credit cards

By its decision in case No. 342/180/17 of 03/07/19, the BC-Supreme Court of Ukraine “broke” the established judicial practice on the collection of overdue debt on PrivatBank credit cards! From this date, the terms and conditions for the provision of banking services posted on the pages of the PrivatBank website: Are not considered a public […]

Ownership of a share in common property: legal subtleties of grounds for termination

We will not dwell on the fact that the right to property is constitutional, therefore inviolable and no one can be deprived or limited in its exercise. The purpose of this publication is to provide information on the nuances of terminating ownership of a share in common property, because this right most often becomes the […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route