Call Leave a request
Dismissal of the director without the consent of the founders (participants)

Dismissal of the director without the consent of the founders (participants)

In Ukraine, there are many legal entities that do not conduct economic activity and, accordingly, do not charge a salary to the director, who remains the only employee. The procedure for liquidation of such enterprises is quite complicated, so the owners are in no hurry to close them. Often, the owners simply lose interest in business, go abroad, or ignore issues related to the activities of such companies.

The directors of such companies actually “hang” in the USR, nobody can solve the issue of their dismissal. There are also situations when conflicts arise between company members, due to which it is impossible to gather the necessary number of votes to dismiss the director, or the members simply ignore his statements.

The director of the enterprise (business partnership) actually has a dual status: on the one hand, he is an employee subject to the labor legislation, and on the other hand, he is a sole executive body of the enterprise or part of its collegial executive body.

However, a company cannot exist without a manager, and even more so – without an executive body, so the dismissal of a director can actually take place by terminating his powers as an executive body, i.e. simultaneously with the appointment of a new manager (or a person who will perform his functions before the appointment of such a manager ).

At the same time, the powers of the director can be terminated only by the Higher Management Body or a single participant.

Current legislation prohibits forced labor and provides for the possibility of dismissal of a person at his own will. On the other hand, corporate law requires a decision of the company’s highest management body to terminate the powers of the executive body.

What to do in case of inactivity of the higher management body?

Again, the Constitution of Ukraine comes to the rescue: the second part of Article 8 guarantees the right to go to court to protect the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens.

Ukrainian courts have developed a positive practice for managers who find themselves in a similar situation.

Algorithm of actions for terminating the authority of the manager without the consent of the participants:

1. Write a resignation letter and send it to the company’s legal address or arrange for field delivery if appropriate. A copy of the specified application should also be sent to the registration addresses of the company’s members.

2. Draw up a demand for convening a meeting of the higher management body at the initiative of the executive body regarding the director’s dismissal and send it to the company’s participants’ registration addresses.

3. Appear at the meeting and record the fact that the meeting did not take place by drawing up a protocol in case of insufficient quorum to make a decision on the termination of the powers of the director or an act on the non-appearance of participants. In case of non-appearance of the participants, it is advisable to attract witnesses to record this event.

4. Prepare a statement of claim and submit it to the court. At this stage, you should correctly choose the method of protection of violated rights and determine the claims accordingly. It is important that the lawsuit contains requirements of a mandatory nature, because after receiving a positive court decision, it will have to be fulfilled.

We recommend using the following requirements:

  1. terminate the powers of the director;
  2. exclude information about the plaintiff as a manager from the register of legal entities;
  3. determine the appropriate participant by the head of the company (as an option, the one with the largest percentage of votes in the company). Because in the process of fulfilling the second requirement, the registrar cannot leave the section of information about the head of the company unfilled.

5. Obtain a positive court decision and submit it to the state registrar for appropriate registration actions.

Of course, the implementation of this algorithm, at first glance, may seem like a simple and ordinary process, but in practice, at each of the specified stages, various legal nuances arise, the solution of which requires professional legal support. Therefore, it will be advisable to contact a professional lawyer who will help to carry out the dismissal of the director and avoid misunderstandings and mistakes during the mentioned procedure and direct defense in court.

04.04.2024

637

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Had delayed paying severance pay? Pay the fine!

The first thing every citizen leaving his old place of work thinks about is how much money will fall on the card as a severance pay. Naturally, he wants more and that’s okay! The employer who signs the dismissal order is thinking about how to pay less! And he can be understood too! But, the […]

SPU on the fulfillment of obligations in a fictitious transaction

Fictitious transactions with residential real estate are always a risk of being left without a roof over your head. It is not entirely clear what the citizen thought, who fictitiously sold his apartment to other people, whose purpose was to obtain a loan from a bank secured by this property. As a result, he had […]

The granddaughter whiсh is registered in the grandmother’s house, for donation is not an obstacle!

The grandmother in court proved her right to donate housing, despite the fact that her little granddaughter was registered in it! The Supreme court, by its conclusion in case No. 385/1598/18, determined that she is not a parent and not the one who replaces him, therefore, she is free in the right of alienation! Here […]

The child of divorced parents is an object of struggle for attention

In 99% of 100%, a divorce is a problematic event, and the help of a lawyer in a divorce is a necessity that determines the outcome of the case. The division of property is half the trouble, and the struggle for the attention of children is a real problem. Let’s leave the prefaces. Live situations […]

SCU on the identification of claims

On January 22, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ukraine “closed by sending for reconsideration” case No. 522/5505/19, explaining that claims for recognizing illegal actions of the state registrar with the subsequent cancellation of his decisions to terminate the encumbrance (release of arrest) from the land plot should not be identified with a measure similar in […]

The case was considered by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

The Supreme Court of Ukraine did not allow the bank to prohibit its debtors from leaving Ukraine, since the CPCU does not have such a measure to secure claims as a temporary restriction of the right to travel abroad, even if a foreclosure procedure has been started with respect to mortgage property. Brief overview of […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route