Call Leave a request
Appealing TNS and tax claims

Appealing TNS and tax claims

It is common knowledge that the lion’s share of the Ukrainian budget is formed at the expense of business, so the state closely monitors that this source of income is not exhausted. This is partially handled by fiscal authorities, which carry out control by conducting inspections.

Checks, let’s say, are not always objective! Their results are reflected in the Inspection Act, as a result of which a written decision of the controlling body is drawn up in the form of a TNS or a tax claim, the essence of which is the addition/payment of a monetary liability.

This applies both to the administration of national and local taxes and fees, as well as to the control of compliance with the currency legislation, USC, etc.

Important: “The subject of economic activity has the right to disagree with the detected violations and the right to appeal the tax notification-solution in an administrative procedure and/or through a court”!

Formally, the above-mentioned right is enshrined in Art. 56 PKU.

Pre-trial settlement of the dispute — administrative appeal procedure in stages:

  • Within 10 days, the course of which begins on the day following receipt of the PPR, a complaint is submitted to a higher-level supervisory body (“on paper” or “electronically” – through the taxpayer’s personal account).

“In case of missing the filing deadline, a request for its renewal is submitted together with the complaint, the supervisory body analyzes the reasons for the delay and renews it if they are valid.”

  • The complaint is considered for 20 calendar days, the period of which begins the day after its submission, but by the decision of the supervisory body, the consideration period can be extended up to 60 calendar days with mandatory notification of this to the payer before the end of the 20 calendar days.

Based on the results of the review of the complaint, the supervisory body makes an appropriate decision. If no decision is made on the merits, the complaint is considered to be considered in favor of the taxpayer.

  • A complaint in the administrative procedure is considered only once, that is, the results of the appeal are final. Disagreement with the decision made on the complaint can be appealed exclusively in court.

“An important nuance! In case of a timely appeal, it is not necessary to pay the amounts specified in the TNS until the review is over, because the financial obligation is recognized as unsettled during this period.”

Another important point! The administrative complaint procedure is not mandatory, the taxpayer can immediately apply to the court.

Judicial resolution of the dispute – features of the appeal and practical aspects

The procedure for appealing decisions of supervisory bodies through court is regulated by the TC and the CAJ of Ukraine. The provisions of these normative acts give the taxpayer the right to appeal the decision of the controlling authorities on the accrualing of monetary liabilities.

  • The term for filing a claim is set from 10 days to 6 months, depending on the type of obligation and the application or non-application of the administrative appeal procedure.

Important moment! The control authorities must be immediately notified of the initiation of an administrative or judicial appeal of the TNS! Failure to do so will result in another tax debt. The above notice will suspend any accruals for the appeal period.

It is impossible to effectively challenge the decisions of regulatory bodies without sufficient preparation. The tax legislation of Ukraine is complex and unstable – this is an absolute fact. In order to decide how exactly to appeal the TNS or other decisions of regulatory authorities in a separate specific case, it is advisable to contact a professional tax lawyer.

Entrust your problem to the lawyers of Attorney Association “Grandliga”, we have experience and practice in defending the rights of taxpayers, both for “peacetime” and for disputes with tax collectors during martial law.

21.09.2023

475

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Representation of interests in the ICAC at the CCI of Ukraine

The International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Ukraine is one of the key institutions for resolving disputes in the field of international business. In this article, we will consider in which cases it is appropriate to apply to the ICAC, who has the right to such an application, […]

Supreme Court: debt collection and replacement of debtors in enforcement proceedings

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine has figured out the issue of who is legally obliged to pay off debts when replacing the original debtor with two – the main and subsidiary at the stage of execution of the court decision. “The replacement of the parties does not relieve anyone from responsibility, […]

Personal mortgage property of a bankrupt entrepreneur: is it subject to collection?

Cassation economic court of the Supreme Court “stood up” for the mortgage apartment of the borrower of the bank, delimiting the personal and business rights and obligations of individual entrepreneurs, as well as limiting the rights of claimants to this property. So, with the conclusion in case No. 922/4404/15, promulgated on 06/04/19, the Supreme Court […]

International search by Interpol: what you need to know

International search by Interpol is a procedure that allows law enforcement agencies from different countries to cooperate in the search and detention of persons who are wanted for criminal offenses. The declaration of a person in international search is a right, not an obligation of law enforcement agencies. The decision to declare a person in […]

Supreme Court of Ukraine on the disclosure of classified materials in criminal cases

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine considered the criminal case No. 751/7557/15-k and on January 16, 2019 published a resolution that regulated the application the Art. 290th Criminal Code. It is important that the Supreme Court decided not to deviate from the existing legal conclusion regulating the procedural aspects of opening materials […]

The amount of moral damage established by the court does not change the SCU

The Supreme Court of Ukraine is not authorized to review the amount of moral damage! This conclusion was made after consideration of case No. 258/1169/14-ts (proceeding No. 61-22745sv18) dated 12/05/2018. So, for consideration by the Supreme Court of Ukraine, a cassation complaint of a plaintiff-private person to a defendant-state enterprise was received. The plaintiff demanded […]

Address

01133, Kyiv, blvd. Lesi Ukrainky 26 (block L26), office 613

Email

info@grandliga.com.ua

Phone number

+380443395088

We work

Schedule: from 10:00 to 18:00
Weekend: Sunday

Make a route