Is the unauthorized disconnection of the apartment from the heating network a basis for canceling charges for heat? The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by a decision on case No. 522\/401\/15-c of 25\/09\/19, answered the question in the negative. The consumer is obliged to pay for the service that has not been consumed anyway!<\/p>\n

Analyzing – why?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Initial situation: CE “Teploset …” goes to court with a claim against a consumer who does not pay for heating and hot water and therefore has a large debt. The court ruled that the demands of the heating network are fair, the appeal instance too …<\/p>\n

In short, the solution was: “use – pay”!<\/p>\n

The consumer did not agree with this and filed a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court of Ukraine. In the complaint, he asked the said decisions of the courts of previous instances to be canceled, arguing that he was right by the fact that the debt is not subject to collection, since:<\/p>\n

\n
• the plaintiff missed the statute of limitations;<\/li>\n
• the consumer is disconnected from the heat supply networks;<\/li>\n
• it is impossible to conduct a legal analysis of the contract<\/strong>, since it does not exist.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

  The Ukrainian Supreme Court analyzed the circumstances of the case and established that it was true: there was no contract, the consumer was a defaulter who had arrears for heat and was unauthorizedly disconnected from the heat supply network. But, these moments are not a reason for non-payment, because …<\/p>\n

  \u201cThe obligation to pay for housing and communal services is regulated by a number of legal acts, a systematic analysis of the norms of which suggests that the absence of an agreement on the provision of services is not a reason for exempting the consumer from paying in full volume. Consequently, the absence of a treaty is not an argument for justice.”<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

  The fact that the consumer unauthorizedly “cut off” from the heating network is generally a violation (Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine \u2116 630 of 21.07.2005 prohibited to do this without permit). There is a special permitting procedure for disconnection, regulated by the “Disconnection Procedure…” approved by the order of the Ministry of Regional Development No. 4 dated November 22, 2005.<\/p>\n

  In the analyzed situation, “on the side” of the heating network, the Laws of Ukraine “On Housing and Utilities Services” and the Laws of Ukraine “On Heat Supply”, annulling the arguments of the cassation about that the consumer did not actually receive services, that means that charging for them is illegal.<\/p>\n

  The Ukrainian Supreme Court also spoke about missing the statute of limitations. The courts of the previous instances \u201cdid not notice\u201d that it was interrupted, therefore, this justification of the cassation appeal is not taken into account.<\/p>\n

  The case was sent for review to the appellate instance, which must decide it taking into account the fact of the interrupted limitation period and with due justification of the court decision obliging the defendant to pay off the debt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  Is the unauthorized disconnection of the apartment from the heating network a basis for canceling charges for heat? The Supreme Court of Ukraine, by a decision on case No. 522\/401\/15-c of 25\/09\/19, answered the question in the negative. The consumer is obliged to pay for the service that has not been consumed anyway! Analyzing – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2095,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n